Search:

Just to clarify, so the closest thing to a fundamental similarity among all warriors/rogues/rangers (not just a specific type like dexterity-oriented warrior) is physical training/adeptness? Even a...

I just want to know if being physically trained is singular to rogues and warriors?

Would hackers and trappers count as rogue subclasses if we were to expand beyond fantasy genre?

What other non-hybrid rogues aren't physically adept?

Is physical adeptness singular to rogues...

Only one question: Is it possible to generalize what I like as one thing? So far, the only thing that I see hunters, rogues, and warriors all share is the fact that they are physically...

HOW CAN? Just one question... would a sniper wielding a futuristic energy weapon not fit in the physical damage? Then I would know if I really like physical damage or not....

Just one question... would a sniper wielding a futuristic energy weapon not fit in the physical damage? Then I would know if I really like physical damage or not....

..........I'm not talking about melee. I stated I include rangers into rogues so I like ranged combat as well...
thanks. But I mean if that logic follows, then why wouldn't that mean I like applied...

yeah but applied mechanics is like the only thing they share in common. and since they're basically opposites with regard to everything else, why wouldn't that imply I like that particular aspect?

If I like both rogues and warriors and if they share a specific similarity, then wouldn't mean that I like that? Which in this case seems to be applied mechanics since they are both proficient in...

any ideas?

Basically, I like the rogue and warrior classes the most in rpgs among the general classes rogues warriors clerics and mages.
I include rangers as a subclass of rogues btw.
Are there are any...