Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Fundamental similarities between general classes in mmorpgs?

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by hlindegar View Post
    They're both melee classes, so you like playing melee classes. This still says nothing about whether or not you'd enjoy physics.
    ..........I'm not talking about melee. I stated I include rangers into rogues so I like ranged combat as well...
    thanks. But I mean if that logic follows, then why wouldn't that mean I like applied mechanics? After all, in the same way as I stated in that scenario, rogues and warriors basically are complete opposites besides the fact that they deal physical damage. Btw, I stated that I include rangers as rogues so it's not only limited to melee. In addition, applied mechanics is the only thing they share right? Why wouldn't I like that singular trait then?

    I mean if you like two things that are completely different except for one single trait. Why wouldn't that imply that you like that single trait? Applied mechanics/physical adeptness is the only thing the two share right?

  2. #12
    It seems you're determined to like applied mechanics so I say kudos to you sir! Go forth and love applied mechanics!

  3. #13
    Vayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Tasmania, Australia
    Posts
    8,398
    Just a warning for those who don't know better, this poster has posted here before under other names, pretty much the same exactly thread a long time ago. He likes to argue in circles and get people to reply. Answering him is probably not going to get you much but more circles but if you like that sort of thing, have fun.

  4. #14
    hlindegar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Norman, OK
    Posts
    197
    Quote Originally Posted by Vayne View Post
    Just a warning for those who don't know better, this poster has posted here before under other names, pretty much the same exactly thread a long time ago. He likes to argue in circles and get people to reply. Answering him is probably not going to get you much but more circles but if you like that sort of thing, have fun.
    Good to know. Not sure why I feel compeled to argue with this kid. You're a writer, so try to imagine some kid saying "I only play mages, and mages use words to cast spells, so do you think that means I'd like 18th century Brittish literature?"

    I suppose there is no point in keeping this going.
    .

  5. #15
    Just one question... would a sniper wielding a futuristic energy weapon not fit in the physical damage? Then I would know if I really like physical damage or not....

  6. #16
    Vayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Tasmania, Australia
    Posts
    8,398
    Quote Originally Posted by hlindegar View Post
    Good to know. Not sure why I feel compeled to argue with this kid. You're a writer, so try to imagine some kid saying "I only play mages, and mages use words to cast spells, so do you think that means I'd like 18th century Brittish literature?"

    I suppose there is no point in keeping this going.
    It's a very subtle form of trolling, and he's very good at it. Long after I realized what he was doing, I continued to answer him, not because I was unaware of it, but it appealed to the writer in me to see where he would go. I found it fun. It annoyed the hell out of other people, however, so I eventually stopped. lol

  7. #17
    HOW CAN? Just one question... would a sniper wielding a futuristic energy weapon not fit in the physical damage? Then I would know if I really like physical damage or not....

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Vayne View Post
    It's a very subtle form of trolling, and he's very good at it. Long after I realized what he was doing, I continued to answer him, not because I was unaware of it, but it appealed to the writer in me to see where he would go. I found it fun. It annoyed the hell out of other people, however, so I eventually stopped. lol
    I didn't find it all that subtle. Though for a minute I did wonder if it was going to turn out to be some form of elaborate spam for an online school.

    Crystal Desert - MMOJumper.8504
    Twitter/Blog

  9. #19
    Vayne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Tasmania, Australia
    Posts
    8,398
    Quote Originally Posted by MMOJumper View Post
    I didn't find it all that subtle. Though for a minute I did wonder if it was going to turn out to be some form of elaborate spam for an online school.
    Well yeah, not that subtle once it goes on for a while. Interesting to dissect it though.

  10. #20
    Only one question: Is it possible to generalize what I like as one thing? So far, the only thing that I see hunters, rogues, and warriors all share is the fact that they are physically proficient/physically trained? Are there any rogue/warrior/ranger archetypes that aren't physically proficient?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •